diff options
author | Kaleb Keithley <kaleb@freedesktop.org> | 2003-11-14 16:49:22 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Kaleb Keithley <kaleb@freedesktop.org> | 2003-11-14 16:49:22 +0000 |
commit | 82a6e01af6c39e22855495b912c23efddfb17224 (patch) | |
tree | f8b4d4eddf8c871e008fbd518770ef966e1679a5 /Written/Outline |
Initial revisionXORG-STABLE
Diffstat (limited to 'Written/Outline')
-rw-r--r-- | Written/Outline | 191 |
1 files changed, 191 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Written/Outline b/Written/Outline new file mode 100644 index 0000000..d83f3e5 --- /dev/null +++ b/Written/Outline @@ -0,0 +1,191 @@ + + Outline for Xbench + ------------------ + +GENERAL +------- + +Stuff starting with '-' are callbacks for that widget. +'<>' means whatever is appropriate. + +Choice widgets will either be implemented as a new type of widget or a +form containing a bunch of Command widgets. The automatic callbacks for +the commands are: + - set all children of parent to normal colors + - set oneself to reverse colors +There will be a + - put <> in buffer, specified by the parent widget +There will also be a + - put <>\n in buffer +specific to each command. + +In general, the buffer does not need to be looked at until the test is +actually run; however, if we decide to "gray out" choices in the Graphics +Options window that have nothing to do with the benchmark, then choosing +a benchmark must flush also. + +Widgets - we need to decide whether the windows that are turn-on-and-offable +should be children of Form, or of TopLevel. If they're children of Form, +then the user won't be able to stack them or have a say in where they go. +We also might run out of space. If they're children of TopLevel, the user +can decide where they go, but he's going to have to choose their location +(with the wm) every time they come up. I would vote for the latter approach. +(Uh oh... I don't think that the TopLevel widget can have more than one +child...) + +All choosing Widgets should write strings in the Xbench language to some +buffer, where the actual testing thing can pull them out. + + + +HIERARCHY OF WIDGETS +-------------------- + +Form (form) surrounding the whole thing (owned by TopLevel) +Title (label) on top describing version & current test (owned by Form) +MenuLine (form) under Title giving top level choices (owned by Form) +MenuLine contains these Commands: + Run + - flush the buffer + - run benchmark + BenchmarkOptionsOn + - map benchmark options window (BenchmarkOptions) + BenchmarkOptionsOff + - unmap benchmark options window + GraphicsOptionsOn + - map graphics options window (GraphicsOptions) + GraphicsOptionsOff + - unmap graphics options window + DescriptionOn + - map description window (Description) + DescriptionOff + - unmap description window + RecordingOn + - bring up dialog box for name of file + - start saving commands into file (set a global boolean TRUE) + RecordingOff + - stop saving commands into file (set the global boolean FALSE) + Playback + - bring up dialog box for name of file + - read from file until EOF + Quit + - quit + +The toggling command buttons exist in pairs, of which only one is visible at +any one point. This makes callbacks/names of buttons easier to implement. + +--- + +BenchmarkOptions (form) describing benchmark options (owned by Toplevel?) +BenchmarkOptions contains: + TestChoice (choice) the 16 different test choices. + - put "test <>" in buffer + - put description of test in Description window + - call disable_gc_choices() with the GC field flags + Iterations (text) the number of times to run. + - put "iterations <>" in buffer + +--- + +GraphicsOptions (form) describing graphics options (owned by Toplevel?) +GraphicsOptions contains: + ChooseFunction (choice) + - put "function <>" in buffer + ChooseColormap (choice) + - put "colormap <>" in buffer + Foreground (text) + - put "foreground <>" in buffer + Background (text) + - put "background <>" in buffer + LineWidth (text) + - put "linewidth <>" in buffer + LineStyle (choice) + - put "linestyle <>" in buffer + CapStyle (choice) + - put "capstyle <>" in buffer + JoinStyle (choice) + - put "joinstyle <>" in buffer + FillStyle (choice) + - put "fillstyle <>" in buffer + FillRule (choice) + - put "fillrule <>" in buffer + ArcMode (choice) + - put "arcmode <>" in buffer + TStipOrigin (text * 2) + - put "tsorigin <>" in buffer + DashList (???) + - put "dashlist <>" in buffer + DashOffset (text?) + - put "dashoffset <>" in buffer + ClipMask (choice) + - put "clipmask <>" in buffer + Planemask (text) + - put "planemask <>" in buffer + +We need specialized widgets for DashList, possibly TStipOrigin and DashOffset. + +Still to be decided: can one choose GC options that have no meaning for that + particular benchmark? I don't think it should be a problem. + +--- + +Description (text) describing the current test (owned by Toplevel?) + +I really need to find out how to use sources and sinks for Text widgets - +the documentation does not say how to do it. + +Every test will have a block of text associated with it. When a new +benchmark is chosen, its associated text will become the source for the +Description widget. Note that we don't have to worry about whether +Description is mapped or not; we're just setting a source. + +--- + +Analysis (text) describing the results of the current test (owned by Form - +we always want this to be around) + +This will display the name of the test, the important values of the GC, +the results of the test, and a short analysis thereof. If more than +one test of a particular benchmark is performed, it will be appended to +the analysis source (not replacing it). This will allow for comparing +results obtained with different GC's. + +--- + +Test (core + expose event handler) for doing the test. + +All this really needs to do, besides actually doing the test, is to +time it and make sure the Analysis part knows about it. + +--- + +RecordingOn / RecordingOff / Playback + +When the user presses Playback, pretty much all we have to do is to +1) change the buffer to the file that he wants, and 2) start reading. +The rest should be taken care of the buffer-interpreting module. + +RecordingOn changes the output buffer _and_ the input buffer to the +desired file. + +RecordingOff changes them both back to the usual. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + |