diff options
| author | Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com> | 2008-05-12 15:44:35 +1000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com> | 2008-05-12 15:44:35 +1000 |
| commit | 1d0f1d31e2ed1d91ee87cb3e02ce48c8c07aa418 (patch) | |
| tree | 5f544c6563546e9cf235b4cf273b7bf9a2196730 | |
| parent | 25e0c3945a51ae8c14b3a847ec75a256e1397f24 (diff) | |
radeon: rs485 vs rs485m.. mobile? non-mobile? bi?
So it appears we have in the wild two chipsets with the same PCI ID (0x1002:0x5974)
that are mobile and non-mobile.
the RH bug references is a desktop system.
The Dell Vostro 1100 also has this chipset with LVDS bits.
| -rw-r--r-- | src/radeon_driver.c | 7 |
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/src/radeon_driver.c b/src/radeon_driver.c index 2701f57a..2acc1e91 100644 --- a/src/radeon_driver.c +++ b/src/radeon_driver.c @@ -1624,6 +1624,13 @@ static Bool RADEONPreInitChipType(ScrnInfoPtr pScrn) xf86DrvMsg(pScrn->scrnIndex, X_INFO, "DELL server detected, force to special setup\n"); } break; + case PCI_CHIP_RS482_5974: + /* RH BZ 444586 - non mobility version + * Dell appear to have the Vostro 1100 with a mobility part with the same pci-id */ + if ((PCI_SUB_VENDOR_ID(info->PciInfo) == 0x1462) && + (PCI_SUB_DEVICE_ID(info->PciInfo) == 0x7141)) { + info->IsMobility = FALSE; + } default: break; } |