diff options
author | Vladimir Dergachev <volodya@mindspring.com> | 2004-12-17 16:50:36 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Vladimir Dergachev <volodya@mindspring.com> | 2004-12-17 16:50:36 +0000 |
commit | ac860ed6bbed84f6fc39a9acf53ee87646cfc8dc (patch) | |
tree | 624dd43cba148eb9521f664b7f8c4eae03287127 /src/radeon_accel.c | |
parent | 3ba5b525c4d6390184fdf79b28c954d5caadc6a4 (diff) |
Modified:
programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/ati/radeon_accel.c
programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/ati/radeon_dri.c
Move DMA robustness fix into radeon_dri.c::RADEONEnterServer() as per
suggestion by Michel Dänzer.
I could not trigger a lockup, even with r300_demo (possibly it has code
that flushes cache inside ?), so this must be good enough..
Diffstat (limited to 'src/radeon_accel.c')
-rw-r--r-- | src/radeon_accel.c | 42 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 42 deletions
diff --git a/src/radeon_accel.c b/src/radeon_accel.c index 3e14217f..ac422571 100644 --- a/src/radeon_accel.c +++ b/src/radeon_accel.c @@ -556,44 +556,6 @@ void RADEONCPFlushIndirect(ScrnInfoPtr pScrn, int discard) buffer->idx); } - /* TODO: Fix this more elegantly. - * Sometimes (especially with multiple DRI clients), this code - * runs immediately after a DRI client issues a rendering command. - * - * The accel code regularly inserts WAIT_UNTIL_IDLE into the - * command buffer that is sent with the indirect buffer below. - * The accel code fails to set the 3D cache flush registers for - * the R300 before sending WAIT_UNTIL_IDLE. Sending a cache flush - * on these new registers is not necessary for pure 2D functionality, - * but it *is* necessary after 3D operations. - * Without the cache flushes before WAIT_UNTIL_IDLE, the R300 locks up. - * - * The CP_IDLE call into the DRM indirectly flushes all caches and - * thus avoids the lockup problem, but the solution is far from ideal. - * Better solutions could be: - * - always flush caches when entering the X server - * - track the type of rendering commands somewhere and issue - * cache flushes when they change - * However, I don't feel confident enough with the control flow - * inside the X server to implement either fix. -- nh - */ - - /* On my computer (Radeon Mobility M10) - The fix below results in x11perf -shmput500 rate of 225.0/sec - which is lower than 264.0/sec I get without it. - - On the other hand, not using CP acceleration at all benchmarks - at 144.0/sec. - - For now let us accept this as a lesser evil, especially as the - DRM driver for R300 is still in flux. - - Once the code is more stable this should probably be moved into DRM driver. - */ - - if (info->ChipFamily>=CHIP_FAMILY_R300) - drmCommandNone(info->drmFD, DRM_RADEON_CP_IDLE); - indirect.idx = buffer->idx; indirect.start = start; indirect.end = buffer->used; @@ -633,10 +595,6 @@ void RADEONCPReleaseIndirect(ScrnInfoPtr pScrn) buffer->idx); } - /* Hack for the R300 (see RADEONCPFlushIndirect for explanation) */ - if (info->ChipFamily>=CHIP_FAMILY_R300) - drmCommandNone(info->drmFD, DRM_RADEON_CP_IDLE); - indirect.idx = buffer->idx; indirect.start = start; indirect.end = buffer->used; |