From a5961a8459614fcaa801a47cda07d3ee8246b16f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Philipp Reh <sefi@s-e-f-i.de>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 17:35:57 +0100
Subject: Fix passive grabs.

_XIPassiveGrabDevice, which is called by alle the passive grab functions,
wrongly returns an error when it shouldn't.
The attached patch adds the missing "not" to properly test the error
condition of _XReply.

Signed-off-by: Philipp Reh <sefi@s-e-f-i.de>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
---
 src/XIPassiveGrab.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/src/XIPassiveGrab.c b/src/XIPassiveGrab.c
index 8953013..98eb806 100644
--- a/src/XIPassiveGrab.c
+++ b/src/XIPassiveGrab.c
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ _XIPassiveGrabDevice(Display* dpy, int deviceid, int grabtype, int detail,
 
     free(buff);
 
-    if (_XReply(dpy, (xReply *)&reply, 0, xTrue))
+    if (!_XReply(dpy, (xReply *)&reply, 0, xTrue))
     {
 	UnlockDisplay(dpy);
 	SyncHandle();
-- 
cgit v1.2.3