diff options
author | Christian Linhart <chris@DemoRecorder.com> | 2014-11-02 13:46:16 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Christian Linhart <chris@demorecorder.com> | 2014-11-03 11:23:16 +0100 |
commit | 51a0d57acc6ec0c9487d2dbc2dda806f05c49884 (patch) | |
tree | 272a5e5235f00aa3b88272b2a41214623baad343 /src | |
parent | 4a915c0dbadf326ea61349e29a0029d29f4bd339 (diff) |
generator: sumof with nested expression
Support sumof with a nested expression.
The nested expression is computed for every list-element
and the result of the computation is added to the sum.
This way, sumof can be applied to a list of structs,
and, e.g., compute the sum of a specific field of that struct.
example:
<struct name="SumofTest_Element">
<field type="CARD16" name="foo" />
<field type="CARD16" name="bar" />
</struct>
<struct name="SumofTest_FieldAccess">
<field type="CARD32" name="len" />
<list type="SumofTest_Element" name="mylist1">
<fieldref>len</fieldref>
</list>
<list type="CARD16" name="mylist2">
<sumof ref="mylist1">
<fieldref>bar</fieldref>
</sumof>
</list>
</struct>
generated tmpvar:
int xcb_pre_tmp_1; /* sumof length */
int xcb_pre_tmp_2; /* sumof loop counter */
int64_t xcb_pre_tmp_3; /* sumof sum */
const xcb_input_sumof_test_element_t* xcb_pre_tmp_4; /* sumof list ptr */
generated code:
/* mylist2 */
/* sumof start */
xcb_pre_tmp_1 = _aux->len;
xcb_pre_tmp_3 = 0;
xcb_pre_tmp_4 = xcb_input_sumof_test_field_access_mylist_1(_aux);
for ( xcb_pre_tmp_2 = 0; xcb_pre_tmp_2 < xcb_pre_tmp_1; xcb_pre_tmp_2++) {
xcb_pre_tmp_3 += xcb_pre_tmp_4->bar;
xcb_pre_tmp_4++;
}
/* sumof end. Result is in xcb_pre_tmp_3 */
xcb_block_len += xcb_pre_tmp_3 * sizeof(uint16_t);
changes for V2 of this patch:
* explicitely set the member access operator in the prefix-tuple
passed to function _c_helper_field_mapping.
This enables us to simplify function "_c_helper_absolute_name"
(which will be renamed "_c_helper_fieldaccess_expr" soon)
V3: Changed style and formatting according to suggestions from Ran Benita
Signed-off-by: Christian Linhart <chris@DemoRecorder.com>
Reviewed-by: Ran Benita <ran234@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <54562798.8040500@DemoRecorder.com>
Patch-Thread-Subject: [Xcb] [PATCHSET] ListInputDevices revision 2
Patch-Set: ListInputDevices
Patch-Number: libxcb 5/9
Patch-Version: V3
Diffstat (limited to 'src')
-rw-r--r-- | src/c_client.py | 25 |
1 files changed, 24 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/src/c_client.py b/src/c_client.py index 0fae837..eae1f6c 100644 --- a/src/c_client.py +++ b/src/c_client.py @@ -1646,7 +1646,30 @@ def _c_accessor_get_expr(expr, field_mapping): _c_pre.code("%s = %s;", listvar, list_name) _c_pre.code("for (%s = 0; %s < %s; %s++) {", loopvar, loopvar, lengthvar, loopvar) _c_pre.indent() - _c_pre.code("%s += *%s;", sumvar, listvar) + + if expr.rhs is None: + _c_pre.code("%s += *%s;", sumvar, listvar) + else: + # sumof has a nested expression which has to be evaluated in + # the context of this list element + + # field mapping for the subexpression needs to include + # the fields of the list-member type + scoped_field_mapping = field_mapping.copy() + scoped_field_mapping.update( + _c_helper_field_mapping( + field.type.member, + [(listvar, '->', field.type.member)])) + + # cause pre-code of the subexpression be added right here + _c_pre.end() + # compute the subexpression + rhs_expr_str = _c_accessor_get_expr(expr.rhs, scoped_field_mapping) + # resume with our code + _c_pre.start() + # output the summation expression + _c_pre.code("%s += %s;", sumvar, rhs_expr_str) + _c_pre.code("%s++;", listvar) _c_pre.pop_indent() _c_pre.code("}") |