Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
More readable grouping this way
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
|
|
An alphabetically ordered list is nice, but it's harder to figure out
based on a diff whether a commit affects the legacy protocols or not.
Let's group those separately, first the normal protocol files, then all the
legacy-only ones.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
|
|
No change to the header, comments only.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
|
|
These keysyms were already present in 2.6.11 which is the first tag in git.
A few notes on specific keys here:
- KEY_EJECTCLOSECD is theoretically different to XF86XK_Eject (kernel
KEY_EJECTCD) but the actual usage in the hwdb remappings seems to be
random. Either way it's already mapped to XF86XK_Eject in
symbols/inet so let's just add an entry for the sake of documenting it.
- XF86XK_CycleAngle seems like the best match for KEY_ANGLE
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
|
|
A few notes on specific keys here:
- Some existing keysyms used some brand names. e.g. KEY_WORDPROCESSOR ->
existing XF86XK_Word. This introduces some minor inconsistency with
unbranded new keys like KEY_GRAPHICSEDITOR -> XF86XK_GraphicsEditor.
- XF86XK_DisplayToggle is *not* XF86XK_Display (which represents
KEY_SWITCHVIDEOMODE)
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
|
|
A few notes on specific keys here:
- There are exiting XF86XK_ZoomIn/Out keys, but they don't seem appropriate
for KEY_CAMERA_ZOOMIN and friends. New symbols are introduced here.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
|
|
ALSToggle has a terrible name, it's the Ambient Light Sensor. But it matches
the kernel define so...
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
|
|
This keysym is already available under a different name, see
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/proto/xorgproto/-/commit/000ebed576aafb44caeea8b6a5de90fba2bdc389
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
|
|
The Linux kernel adds a few evdev keycodes roughly every other release. These
aren't available as keysyms through XKB until they have been added as keycode
in xkeyboard-config and mapped there to a newly defined keysym in the X11
proto headers.
In the past, this was done manually, a suitable keysym was picked at
random and the mapping updated accordingly. This doesn't scale very well and,
given we have a large reserved range for XF86 keysyms anyway, can be done
easier.
Let's reserve the range 0x10081XXX range for a 1:1 mapping of Linux kernel
codes. That's 4095 values, the kernel currently uses only 767 anyway. The
lower 3 bytes of keysyms within that range have to match the kernel value to
make them easy to add and search for. Nothing in X must care about the actual
keysym value anyway.
Since we expect this to be parsed by other scripts for automatic updating, the
format of those #defines is quite strict. Add a script to generate keycodes as
well as verify that the existing ones match the current expected format.
The script is integrated into the CI and meson test, so we will fail if an
update breaks the expectations.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
|
|
Build an Arch image that tests a meson build with all build options we support
(well, the single one so far).
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
|
|
We've been adding to those over the last few years. Not a huge amount but
enough that we should stop pretending we don't touch that header.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
|
|
They are fixed length (4 characters), and don't need NUL-terminators.
This makes gcc stop warning when they're not NUL-terminated, and instead
warn if they are passed to functions expecting NUL-terminated strings.
Signed-off-by: Alan Coopersmith <alan.coopersmith@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
|
|
Bumps xproto version to 7.0.33
Signed-off-by: Alan Coopersmith <alan.coopersmith@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
|
|
Meson's pkg.generate() is not suitable for header only libraries
and using configure_file() allows for more fine tuned control.
This also makes the meson and autotools builds more in sync where
they both use the same .pc.in files.
v2: Drop exec_prefix.
|
|
This is not used by xorg-devel which contains only headers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Found by using:
codespell --builtin clear,rare,usage,informal,code,names
Signed-off-by: Alan Coopersmith <alan.coopersmith@oracle.com>
|
|
As of version 7.7, the X protocol does not define a Unicode equivalent for
them. The U+27E8 and U+27E9 equivalents were introduced by 618956f1f ("The
big keysym cleanup, to bring implementation in line with the recent revision
of Appendix A of the protocol spec."), but as xterm Patch #226 explicitly
notes, U+2329 and U+232A should be used rather than U+27E8 and U+27E9. Gtk
also inherited this.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>
|
|
+ is interpreted when not escaped.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>
|