double words fix; docs are slowly getting moved to mdoc, but this

change will help people translating them.

ok jmc@, schwarze@

2 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/lib/libcrypto/doc/EVP_PKEY_verify.pod b/lib/libcrypto/doc/EVP_PKEY_verify.pod
index ba317b4e7bc..0f092ca8e19 100644
--- a/lib/libcrypto/doc/EVP_PKEY_verify.pod
+++ b/lib/libcrypto/doc/EVP_PKEY_verify.pod
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ context if several operations are performed using the same parameters.
 
 EVP_PKEY_verify_init() and EVP_PKEY_verify() return 1 if the verification was
 successful and 0 if it failed. Unlike other functions the return value 0 from
-EVP_PKEY_verify() only indicates that the signature did not not verify
+EVP_PKEY_verify() only indicates that the signature did not verify
 successfully (that is tbs did not match the original data or the signature was
 of invalid form) it is not an indication of a more serious error.
 
diff --git a/lib/libcrypto/doc/engine.pod b/lib/libcrypto/doc/engine.pod
index 578a7023713..80201128352 100644
--- a/lib/libcrypto/doc/engine.pod
+++ b/lib/libcrypto/doc/engine.pod
@@ -514,7 +514,7 @@ implemented by ENGINEs should be numbered from. Any command value lower than
 this symbol is considered a "generic" command is handled directly by the
 OpenSSL core routines.
 
-It is using these "core" control commands that one can discover the the control
+It is using these "core" control commands that one can discover the control
 commands implemented by a given ENGINE, specifically the commands;
 
  #define ENGINE_HAS_CTRL_FUNCTION		10