It turns out SYNOPSIS mode does not imply .Bk in general,

but only within .Nm blocks.  Simplify the code accordingly.
This reduces groff-mandoc differences in base by about 2%.

Triggered by research done by Franco Fichtner.

2 files changed, 5 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/regress/usr.bin/mandoc/mdoc/Bk/synopsis.in b/regress/usr.bin/mandoc/mdoc/Bk/synopsis.in
index 7dccddb388a..37832bbd9d9 100644
--- a/regress/usr.bin/mandoc/mdoc/Bk/synopsis.in
+++ b/regress/usr.bin/mandoc/mdoc/Bk/synopsis.in
@@ -1,10 +1,12 @@
-.Dd $Mdocdate: May 29 2013 $
+.Dd $Mdocdate: December 24 2013 $
 .Dt BK-SYNOPSIS 1
 .Os OpenBSD
 .Sh NAME
 .Nm Bk-synopsis
 .Nd automatic keeps in the synopsis
 .Sh SYNOPSIS
+In the synopsis, almost all macros do not show
+.No the word keep effect they would get in a \&Bk block.
 .Nm ksh
 .Op Fl +abCefhiklmnpruvXx
 .Op Fl +o Ar option
diff --git a/regress/usr.bin/mandoc/mdoc/Bk/synopsis.out_ascii b/regress/usr.bin/mandoc/mdoc/Bk/synopsis.out_ascii
index 05710039eef..082defe66d9 100644
--- a/regress/usr.bin/mandoc/mdoc/Bk/synopsis.out_ascii
+++ b/regress/usr.bin/mandoc/mdoc/Bk/synopsis.out_ascii
@@ -4,6 +4,8 @@ NNAAMMEE
      BBkk--ssyynnooppssiiss - automatic keeps in the synopsis
 
 SSYYNNOOPPSSIISS
+     In the synopsis, almost all macros do not show the word keep effect they
+     would get in a Bk block.
      kksshh [--++aabbCCeeffhhiikkllmmnnpprruuvvXXxx] [--++oo _o_p_t_i_o_n]
          [--cc _s_t_r_i_n_g | --ss | _f_i_l_e [_a_r_g_u_m_e_n_t _._._.]]
      kksshh [--++aabbCCeeffhhiikkllmmnnpprruuvvXXxx] [--++oo _o_p_t_i_o_n]