diff options
author | Otto Moerbeek <otto@cvs.openbsd.org> | 2003-11-10 20:32:18 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Otto Moerbeek <otto@cvs.openbsd.org> | 2003-11-10 20:32:18 +0000 |
commit | 958872a868e1d3b880930ae4d3daf3e60c550244 (patch) | |
tree | 42b8fb35c17e059822d74d5e21d05c3fb79861d7 /share | |
parent | d0d25bff3068abfd790a29b538e6d1ca01a165f9 (diff) |
The classic password paper by Thompson and Morris, with the Caldera license. It may be written
about 25 years ago, but it is still worth reading.
ok jmc@ mickey@
Diffstat (limited to 'share')
-rw-r--r-- | share/doc/smm/17.password/Makefile | 10 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | share/doc/smm/17.password/password.ms | 597 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | share/doc/smm/Makefile | 8 |
3 files changed, 611 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/share/doc/smm/17.password/Makefile b/share/doc/smm/17.password/Makefile new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..442de7b9ca3 --- /dev/null +++ b/share/doc/smm/17.password/Makefile @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +# $OpenBSD: Makefile,v 1.1 2003/11/10 20:32:17 otto Exp $ + +DIR= smm/17.password +SRCS= password.ms +MACROS= -ms + +paper.ps: ${SRCS} + ${TBL} ${SRCS} | ${EQN} | ${ROFF} > ${.TARGET} + +.include <bsd.doc.mk> diff --git a/share/doc/smm/17.password/password.ms b/share/doc/smm/17.password/password.ms new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..032f8aa10da --- /dev/null +++ b/share/doc/smm/17.password/password.ms @@ -0,0 +1,597 @@ +.\" $OpenBSD: password.ms,v 1.1 2003/11/10 20:32:17 otto Exp $ +.\" +.\" Copyright (C) Caldera International Inc. 2001-2002. +.\" All rights reserved. +.\" +.\" Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without +.\" modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions +.\" are met: +.\" 1. Redistributions of source code and documentation must retain the above +.\" copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. +.\" 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright +.\" notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the +.\" documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution. +.\" 3. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this software +.\" must display the following acknowledgement: +.\" This product includes software developed or owned by Caldera +.\" International, Inc. +.\" 4. Neither the name of Caldera International, Inc. nor the names of other +.\" contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from +.\" this software without specific prior written permission. +.\" +.\" USE OF THE SOFTWARE PROVIDED FOR UNDER THIS LICENSE BY CALDERA +.\" INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND CONTRIBUTORS ``AS IS'' AND ANY EXPRESS OR +.\" IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES +.\" OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. +.\" IN NO EVENT SHALL CALDERA INTERNATIONAL, INC. BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, +.\" INDIRECT INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES +.\" (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR +.\" SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) +.\" HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, +.\" STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING +.\" IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE +.\" POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. +.\" +.\" @(#)password.ms 8.1 (Berkeley) 6/8/93 +.\" +.\" tbl mm ^ eqn ^ troff -ms +.EH 'SMM:17-%''Password Security: A Case History' +.OH 'Password Security: A Case History''SMM:17-%' +.EQ +delim $$ +.EN +.\".RP +.\" TM 78-1271-5 39199 39199-11 +.ND April 3, 1978 +.TL +Password Security: +A Case History +.\" .OK +.\"Encryption +.\"Computing +.AU "MH 2C-524" 3878 +Robert Morris +.AU "MH 2C-523" 2394 +Ken Thompson +.AI +AT&T Bell Laboratories +Murray Hill, NJ +.AB +This paper describes the history of the design of the +password security scheme on a remotely accessed time-sharing +system. +The present design was the result of countering +observed attempts to penetrate the system. +The result is a compromise between extreme security and +ease of use. +.AE +.\" .CS 6 0 6 0 0 4 +.SH +INTRODUCTION +.PP +Password security on the +.UX +time-sharing system [1] is provided by a +collection of programs +whose elaborate and strange design is the outgrowth of +many years of experience with earlier versions. +To help develop a secure system, we have had a continuing +competition to devise new ways to +attack the security of the system (the bad guy) and, at the same time, to +devise new techniques to resist the new attacks (the good guy). +This competition has been in the same vein as the +competition of long standing between manufacturers of armor +plate and those of armor-piercing shells. +For this reason, the description that follows will +trace the history of the password system rather than simply +presenting the program in its current state. +In this way, the reasons for the design will be made clearer, +as the design cannot be understood without also +understanding the potential attacks. +.PP +An underlying goal has been to provide password security +at minimal inconvenience to the users of the system. +For example, those who want to run a completely open +system without passwords, or to have passwords only at the +option of the individual users, are able to do so, while +those who require all of their users to have passwords +gain a high degree of security +against penetration of the system by unauthorized +users. +.PP +The password system must be able not only to prevent +any access to the system by unauthorized users +(i.e. prevent them from logging in at all), +but it must also +prevent users who are already logged in from doing +things that they are not authorized to do. +The so called ``super-user'' password, for example, is especially +critical because the super-user has all sorts of +permissions and has essentially unlimited access to +all system resources. +.PP +Password security is of course only one component of +overall system security, but it is an essential component. +Experience has shown that attempts to penetrate +remote-access systems have been astonishingly +sophisticated. +.PP +Remote-access systems are peculiarly vulnerable to +penetration by outsiders as there are threats at the +remote terminal, along the communications link, as well +as at the computer itself. +Although the security of a password encryption algorithm +is an interesting intellectual and mathematical problem, +it is only one tiny facet of a very large problem. +In practice, physical security of the computer, communications +security of the communications link, and physical control +of the computer itself loom as far more important issues. +Perhaps most important of all is control over the actions +of ex-employees, since they are not under any direct control +and they may have intimate +knowledge about the system, its resources, and +methods of access. +Good system security involves realistic +evaluation of the risks not only of deliberate +attacks but also of casual unauthorized access +and accidental disclosure. +.SH +PROLOGUE +.PP +The UNIX system was first implemented with a password file that contained +the actual passwords of all the users, and for that reason +the password file had to +be heavily protected against being either read or written. +Although historically, this had been the technique used +for remote-access systems, +it was completely unsatisfactory for several reasons. +.PP +The technique is excessively vulnerable to lapses in +security. +Temporary loss of protection can occur when +the password file is being edited or otherwise modified. +There is no way to prevent the making of copies by +privileged users. +Experience with several earlier remote-access systems +showed that such lapses occur with frightening frequency. +Perhaps the most memorable such occasion occurred +in the early 60's when +a system administrator on the CTSS system at MIT +was editing the +password file and another system administrator was editing +the daily message that is printed on everyone's terminal +on login. +Due to a software design error, the temporary editor files +of the two users were interchanged and thus, for a time, the password +file was printed on every terminal when it was logged in. +.PP +Once such a lapse in security has been discovered, everyone's +password must be changed, usually simultaneously, at a considerable +administrative cost. +This is not a great matter, but +far more serious is the high probability of such lapses +going unnoticed by the system administrators. +.PP +Security against unauthorized disclosure of the passwords was, +in the last analysis, impossible with this system because, +for example, if the +contents of the file system are put on to magnetic tape for +backup, as they must be, then anyone who has physical +access to the tape +can read anything on it with no restriction. +.PP +Many programs must get information of various kinds +about the users of the system, and these programs in general +should have no special permission to read the password file. +The information which should have been in the password file actually was +distributed (or replicated) into a number of files, all of +which had to be updated whenever a user was added to or +dropped from the system. +.SH +THE FIRST SCHEME +.PP +The obvious solution is to arrange that the passwords not +appear in the system at all, and it is not difficult to decide +that this can be done by encrypting each user's password, +putting only the encrypted form in the password file, and +throwing away his original password (the one that +he typed in). +When the user later tries to log in to the system, the password +that he types is encrypted and compared with the encrypted +version in the password file. +If the two match, his login attempt is accepted. +Such a scheme was first described +in [3, p.91ff.]. +It also seemed advisable to devise +a system in which neither the password file nor the +password program itself needed to be +protected against being read by anyone. +.PP +All that was needed to implement these ideas +was to find a means of encryption that was very difficult +to invert, even when the encryption program +is available. +Most of the standard encryption methods used (in the past) +for encryption of messages are rather easy to invert. +A convenient and rather good encryption program happened +to exist on the system at the time; it simulated the +M-209 cipher machine [4] +used by the U.S. Army during World War II. +It turned out that the M-209 program was usable, but with +a given key, the ciphers produced by this program are +trivial to invert. +It is a much more difficult matter to find out the key +given the cleartext input and the enciphered output of the program. +Therefore, +the password was used not as the text to be encrypted but as the +key, and a constant was encrypted using this key. +The encrypted result was entered into the password file. +.SH +ATTACKS ON THE FIRST APPROACH +.PP +Suppose that the bad guy has available +the text of the password encryption program and +the complete password file. +Suppose also that he has substantial computing +capacity at his disposal. +.PP +One obvious approach to penetrating the password +mechanism is to attempt to find a general method of inverting +the encryption algorithm. +Very possibly this can be done, but few +successful results +have come to light, despite substantial efforts extending +over a period of more than five years. +The results have not proved to be very useful +in penetrating systems. +.PP +Another approach to penetration is simply to keep trying +potential +passwords until one succeeds; this is a general cryptanalytic +approach called +.I +key search. +.R +Human beings being what they are, there is a strong tendency +for people to choose relatively short and simple passwords that +they can remember. +Given free choice, most people will choose their passwords +from a restricted character set (e.g. all lower-case letters), +and will often choose words or names. +This human habit makes the key search job a great deal easier. +.PP +The critical factor involved in key search is the amount of +time needed to encrypt a potential password and to check the result +against an entry in the password file. +The running time to encrypt one trial password and check +the result turned out to be approximately 1.25 milliseconds on +a PDP-11/70 when the encryption algorithm was recoded for +maximum speed. +It is takes essentially no more time to test the encrypted +trial password against all the passwords in +an entire password file, or for that matter, against +any collection of encrypted passwords, perhaps collected +from many installations. +.PP +If we want to check all passwords of length +.I +n +.R +that consist entirely of lower-case letters, the number +of such passwords is $26 sup n$. +If we suppose that the password consists of +printable characters only, then the number of possible passwords +is somewhat less than $95 sup n$. +(The standard system ``character erase'' and ``line kill'' +characters are, for example, not prime +candidates.) +We can immediately estimate the running time of a program that +will test every password of a given length with all of its +characters chosen from some set of characters. +The following table gives estimates of the running time +required on a PDP-11/70 +to test all possible character strings of length $n$ +chosen from various sets of characters: namely, all lower-case +letters, all lower-case letters plus digits, +all alphanumeric characters, all 95 printable +ASCII characters, and finally all 128 ASCII characters. +.TS +cccccc +cccccc +nnnnnn. + 26 lower-case 36 lower-case letters 62 alphanumeric 95 printable all 128 ASCII +n letters and digits characters characters characters +.sp .5 +1 30 msec. 40 msec. 80 msec. 120 msec. 160 msec. +2 800 msec. 2 sec. 5 sec. 11 sec. 20 sec. +3 22 sec. 58 sec. 5 min. 17 min. 43 min. +4 10 min. 35 min. 5 hrs. 28 hrs. 93 hrs. +5 4 hrs. 21 hrs. 318 hrs. +6 107 hrs. +.TE +.LP +One has to conclude that it is no great matter for someone with +access to a PDP-11 to test all lower-case alphabetic strings up +to length five +and, given access to the machine for, say, several weekends, to test +all such strings up to six characters in length. +By using such a program against a collection of actual encrypted +passwords, a substantial fraction of all the passwords will be +found. +.PP +Another profitable approach for the bad guy is to use the word +list from a dictionary or to use a list of names. +For example, a large commercial dictionary contains typicallly about +250,000 words; these words can be checked in about five minutes. +Again, a noticeable fraction of any collection of passwords +will be found. +Improvements and extensions will be (and have been) found by +a determined bad guy. +Some ``good'' things to try are: +.IP - +The dictionary with the words spelled backwards. +.IP - +A list of first names (best obtained from some mailing list). +Last names, street names, and city names also work well. +.IP - +The above with initial upper-case letters. +.IP - +All valid license plate numbers in your state. +(This takes about five hours in New Jersey.) +.IP - +Room numbers, social security numbers, telephone numbers, and +the like. +.PP +The authors have conducted experiments to try to determine +typical users' habits in the choice of passwords when no +constraint is put on their choice. +The results were disappointing, except to the bad guy. +In a collection of 3,289 passwords +gathered from many users over a long period of time; +.IP +15 were a single ASCII character; +.IP +72 were strings of two ASCII characters; +.IP +464 were strings of three ASCII characters; +.IP +477 were string of four alphamerics; +.IP +706 were five letters, all upper-case or all lower-case; +.IP +605 were six letters, all lower-case. +.LP +An additional 492 passwords appeared in various available +dictionaries, name lists, and the like. +A total of 2,831, or 86% of this sample of passwords fell into one of +these classes. +.PP +There was, of course, considerable overlap between the +dictionary results and the character string searches. +The dictionary search alone, which required only five +minutes to run, produced about one third of the passwords. +.PP +Users could be urged (or forced) to use either longer passwords +or passwords chosen from a larger character set, or the system +could itself choose passwords for the users. +.SH +AN ANECDOTE +.PP +An entertaining and instructive example is +the attempt made at one installation to force users to use less predictable +passwords. +The users did not choose their own passwords; the system supplied +them. +The supplied passwords were eight characters long and +were taken from the character set consisting of +lower-case letters and digits. +They were generated by a pseudo-random number generator +with only $2 sup 15$ starting values. +The time required to search (again on a PDP-11/70) through +all character strings of length 8 from a 36-character +alphabet is 112 years. +.PP +Unfortunately, only $2 sup 15$ of them need be looked at, +because that is the number of possible outputs of the random +number generator. +The bad guy did, in fact, generate and test each of these strings +and found every one of the system-generated passwords using +a total of only about one minute of machine time. +.SH +IMPROVEMENTS TO THE FIRST APPROACH +.NH +Slower Encryption +.PP +Obviously, the first algorithm used was far too fast. +The announcement of the DES encryption algorithm [2] +by the National Bureau of Standards +was timely and fortunate. +The DES is, by design, hard to invert, but equally valuable +is the fact that it is extremely slow when implemented in +software. +The DES was implemented and used in the following way: +The first eight characters of the user's password are +used as a key for the DES; then the algorithm +is used to encrypt a constant. +Although this constant is zero at the moment, it is easily +accessible and can be made installation-dependent. +Then the DES algorithm is iterated 25 times and the +resulting 64 bits are repacked to become a string of +11 printable characters. +.NH +Less Predictable Passwords +.PP +The password entry program was modified so as to urge +the user to use more obscure passwords. +If the user enters an alphabetic password (all upper-case or +all lower-case) shorter than six characters, or a +password from a larger character set shorter than five +characters, then the program asks him to enter a +longer password. +This further reduces the efficacy of key search. +.PP +These improvements make it exceedingly difficult to find +any individual password. +The user is warned of the risks and if he cooperates, +he is very safe indeed. +On the other hand, he is not prevented from using +his spouse's name if he wants to. +.NH +Salted Passwords +.PP +The key search technique is still +likely to turn up a few passwords when it is used +on a large collection of passwords, and it seemed wise to make this +task as difficult as possible. +To this end, when a password is first entered, the password program +obtains a 12-bit random number (by reading the real-time clock) +and appends this to the password typed in by the user. +The concatenated string is encrypted and both the +12-bit random quantity (called the $salt$) and the 64-bit +result of the encryption are entered into the password +file. +.PP +When the user later logs in to the system, the 12-bit +quantity is extracted from the password file and appended +to the typed password. +The encrypted result is required, as before, to be the same as the +remaining 64 bits in the password file. +This modification does not increase the task of finding +any individual +password, +starting from scratch, +but now the work of testing a given character string +against a large collection of encrypted passwords has +been multiplied by 4096 ($2 sup 12$). +The reason for this is that there are 4096 encrypted +versions of each password and one of them has been picked more +or less at random by the system. +.PP +With this modification, +it is likely that the bad guy can spend days of computer +time trying to find a password on a system with hundreds +of passwords, and find none at all. +More important is the fact that it becomes impractical +to prepare an encrypted dictionary in advance. +Such an encrypted dictionary could be used to crack +new passwords in milliseconds when they appear. +.PP +There is a (not inadvertent) side effect of this +modification. +It becomes nearly impossible to find out whether a +person with passwords on two or more systems has used +the same password on all of them, +unless you already know that. +.NH +The Threat of the DES Chip +.PP +Chips to perform the DES encryption are already commercially +available and they are very fast. +The use of such a chip speeds up the process of password +hunting by three orders of magnitude. +To avert this possibility, one of the internal tables +of the DES algorithm +(in particular, the so-called E-table) +is changed in a way that depends on the 12-bit random +number. +The E-table is inseparably wired into the DES chip, +so that the commercial chip cannot be used. +Obviously, the bad guy could have his own chip designed and +built, but the cost would be unthinkable. +.NH +A Subtle Point +.PP +To login successfully on the UNIX system, it is necessary +after dialing in to type a valid user name, and then the +correct password for that user name. +It is poor design to write the login command in such a way that it +tells an interloper when he has typed in a invalid user name. +The response to an invalid name should be identical to +that for a valid name. +.PP +When the slow encryption algorithm was first implemented, +the encryption was done only if the user name was valid, +because otherwise there was no encrypted password to +compare with the supplied password. +The result was that the response was delayed +by about one-half second if the name was valid, but was +immediate if invalid. +The bad guy could find out +whether a particular user name was valid. +The routine was modified to do the encryption in either +case. +.SH +CONCLUSIONS +.PP +On the issue of password security, UNIX is probably +better than most systems. +The use of encrypted passwords appears reasonably +secure in the absence of serious attention of experts +in the field. +.PP +It is also worth some effort to conceal even the encrypted +passwords. +Some UNIX systems have instituted what is called an +``external security code'' that must be typed when +dialing into the system, but before logging in. +If this code is changed periodically, then someone +with an old password will likely be prevented from +using it. +.PP +Whenever any security procedure is instituted that attempts +to deny access to unauthorized persons, it is wise to +keep a record of both successful and unsuccessful attempts +to get at the secured resource. +Just as an out-of-hours visitor to a computer center normally +must not only identify himself, but a record is usually also kept of +his entry. +Just so, it is a wise precaution to make and keep a record +of all attempts to log into a remote-access time-sharing +system, and certainly all unsuccessful attempts. +.PP +Bad guys fall on a spectrum whose one end is someone with +ordinary access to a system and whose goal is to find +out a particular password (usually that of the super-user) +and, at the other end, someone who wishes to collect as +much password information as possible from as many systems +as possible. +Most of the work reported here serves to frustrate the latter type; +our experience indicates that the former type of bad guy never +was very successful. +.PP +We recognize that a time-sharing system must operate in a +hostile environment. +We did not attempt to hide the security aspects of the operating +system, thereby playing the customary make-believe game in +which weaknesses of the system are not discussed no matter +how apparent. +Rather we advertised the password algorithm and invited attack +in the belief that this approach would minimize future trouble. +The approach has been successful. +.\" .SG MH-1271-RM/KT +.SH +References +.IP [1] +Ritchie, D.M. and Thompson, K. +The UNIX Time-Sharing System. +.I +Comm. ACM +.B +17 +.R +(July 1974), +pp. 365-375. +.IP [2] +.I +Proposed Federal Information Processing Data Encryption Standard. +.R +Federal Register (40FR12134), March 17, 1975 +.IP [3] +Wilkes, M. V. +.I +Time-Sharing Computer Systems. +.R +American Elsevier, +New York, (1968). +.IP [4] +U. S. Patent Number 2,089,603. diff --git a/share/doc/smm/Makefile b/share/doc/smm/Makefile index 7d46af46217..7403c89ab98 100644 --- a/share/doc/smm/Makefile +++ b/share/doc/smm/Makefile @@ -1,18 +1,18 @@ -# $OpenBSD: Makefile,v 1.3 1997/08/07 09:01:49 niklas Exp $ +# $OpenBSD: Makefile,v 1.4 2003/11/10 20:32:17 otto Exp $ # from: @(#)Makefile 8.1 (Berkeley) 6/10/93 # The following modules do not build/install: # 10.named, 13.amd # Missing: -# 02.config 11.timedop 12.timed +# 02.config # Missing from 4.4BSD-Lite: -# 14.uucpimpl 15.uucpnet 16.security 17.password +# 14.uucpimpl 15.uucpnet 16.security DOCDIR= /usr/share/doc/smm FILES= 00.contents Makefile Title -SUBDIR= 01.setup 04.quotas 05.fastfs 06.nfs 18.net +SUBDIR= 01.setup 04.quotas 05.fastfs 06.nfs 17.password 18.net .if exists(03.fsck_ffs) SUBDIR+= 03.fsck_ffs .endif |