From Andrushock, s/sucess/success/g

6 files changed, 13 insertions, 13 deletions

diff --git a/sys/arch/amiga/dev/if_es.c b/sys/arch/amiga/dev/if_es.c
index 8eac6515195..dc618467a2a 100644
--- a/sys/arch/amiga/dev/if_es.c
+++ b/sys/arch/amiga/dev/if_es.c
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/*	$OpenBSD: if_es.c,v 1.13 2002/03/14 01:26:29 millert Exp $	*/
+/*	$OpenBSD: if_es.c,v 1.14 2002/12/09 00:45:37 millert Exp $	*/
 /*	$NetBSD: if_es.c,v 1.16 1996/12/23 09:10:17 veego Exp $	*/
 
 /*
@@ -466,8 +466,8 @@ zzzz:
 			 * This shouldn't have happened:  IST_TX indicates
 			 * the TX completion FIFO is not empty, but the
 			 * status for the packet on the completion FIFO
-			 * shows that the transmit was sucessful.  Since
-			 * AutoRelease is being used, a sucessful transmit
+			 * shows that the transmit was successful.  Since
+			 * AutoRelease is being used, a successful transmit
 			 * should not result in a packet on the completion
 			 * FIFO.  Also, that packet doesn't seem to want
 			 * to be acknowledged.  If this occurs, just reset
diff --git a/sys/arch/amiga/dev/if_esreg.h b/sys/arch/amiga/dev/if_esreg.h
index 86e8456bbc2..afd5fc68618 100644
--- a/sys/arch/amiga/dev/if_esreg.h
+++ b/sys/arch/amiga/dev/if_esreg.h
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/*	$OpenBSD: if_esreg.h,v 1.3 1997/01/16 09:24:44 niklas Exp $	*/
+/*	$OpenBSD: if_esreg.h,v 1.4 2002/12/09 00:45:37 millert Exp $	*/
 /*	$NetBSD: if_esreg.h,v 1.4 1996/05/01 15:51:08 mhitch Exp $	*/
 
 /*
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ union smcregs {
 /* EPH Status Register */
 #define	EPHSR_16COL	0x1000		/* 16 collisions reached */
 #define	EPHSR_MULCOL	0x0400		/* Multiple collsions */
-#define	EPHSR_TX_SUC	0x0100		/* Last transmit sucessful */
+#define	EPHSR_TX_SUC	0x0100		/* Last transmit successful */
 #define	EPHSR_LOST_CAR	0x0004		/* Lost carrier */
 
 /* Receive Control Register */
diff --git a/sys/arch/hp300/dev/hil.c b/sys/arch/hp300/dev/hil.c
index 4d70c185fd8..782ef2cee5c 100644
--- a/sys/arch/hp300/dev/hil.c
+++ b/sys/arch/hp300/dev/hil.c
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/*	$OpenBSD: hil.c,v 1.15 2002/03/14 01:26:30 millert Exp $	*/
+/*	$OpenBSD: hil.c,v 1.16 2002/12/09 00:45:37 millert Exp $	*/
 /*	$NetBSD: hil.c,v 1.34 1997/04/02 22:37:32 scottr Exp $	*/
 
 /*
@@ -968,7 +968,7 @@ hilevent(hilp)
 		 * Copy data to queue.
 		 * If this is the first queue we construct the packet
 		 * with length, timestamp and poll buffer data.
-		 * For second and sucessive packets we just duplicate
+		 * For second and successive packets we just duplicate
 		 * the first packet.
 		 */
 		pp = (u_char *) &hq->hil_event[hq->hil_evqueue.tail];
diff --git a/sys/arch/hp300/hp300/trap.c b/sys/arch/hp300/hp300/trap.c
index d7c47cd016f..02aef00e1d2 100644
--- a/sys/arch/hp300/hp300/trap.c
+++ b/sys/arch/hp300/hp300/trap.c
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/*	$OpenBSD: trap.c,v 1.38 2002/06/23 03:03:15 deraadt Exp $	*/
+/*	$OpenBSD: trap.c,v 1.39 2002/12/09 00:45:37 millert Exp $	*/
 /*	$NetBSD: trap.c,v 1.57 1998/02/16 20:58:31 thorpej Exp $	*/
 
 /*
@@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ again:
 	 * If any writeback fails, go back and attempt signal delivery.
 	 * unless we have already been here and attempted the writeback
 	 * (e.g. bad address with user ignoring SIGSEGV).  In that case
-	 * we just return to the user without sucessfully completing
+	 * we just return to the user without successfully completing
 	 * the writebacks.  Maybe we should just drop the sucker?
 	 */
 	if (cputype == CPU_68040 && fp->f_format == FMT7) {
diff --git a/sys/arch/mvme68k/mvme68k/trap.c b/sys/arch/mvme68k/mvme68k/trap.c
index 1878a24d631..3525bdae77c 100644
--- a/sys/arch/mvme68k/mvme68k/trap.c
+++ b/sys/arch/mvme68k/mvme68k/trap.c
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/*	$OpenBSD: trap.c,v 1.46 2002/06/23 03:03:15 deraadt Exp $ */
+/*	$OpenBSD: trap.c,v 1.47 2002/12/09 00:45:37 millert Exp $ */
 
 /*
  * Copyright (c) 1995 Theo de Raadt
@@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ again:
 	 * If any writeback fails, go back and attempt signal delivery.
 	 * unless we have already been here and attempted the writeback
 	 * (e.g. bad address with user ignoring SIGSEGV).  In that case
-	 * we just return to the user without sucessfully completing
+	 * we just return to the user without successfully completing
 	 * the writebacks.  Maybe we should just drop the sucker?
 	 */
 	if (mmutype == MMU_68040 && fp->f_format == FMT7) {
diff --git a/sys/arch/mvme88k/ddb/db_trace.c b/sys/arch/mvme88k/ddb/db_trace.c
index 418bfb7b1e6..66f8e41a28a 100644
--- a/sys/arch/mvme88k/ddb/db_trace.c
+++ b/sys/arch/mvme88k/ddb/db_trace.c
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/*	$OpenBSD: db_trace.c,v 1.16 2002/05/18 09:49:17 art Exp $	*/
+/*	$OpenBSD: db_trace.c,v 1.17 2002/12/09 00:45:37 millert Exp $	*/
 /*
  * Mach Operating System
  * Copyright (c) 1993-1991 Carnegie Mellon University
@@ -616,7 +616,7 @@ stack_decode(unsigned addr, unsigned *stack, int (*pr)(const char *, ...))
 				if (!db_trace_get_val(check_addr + 4, &inst))
 					continue;
 				if (ST_R1_R31_IMM(instr))
-					break; /* sucess */
+					break; /* success */
 #else
 				/*
 				 * Latest GCC optimizer is just too good... the store