When the man page contains such obvious stupid TRIVIAL bugs as this

which I am fixing, it makes me wonder why the hell is the shown
example not something that someone has actually TRIED?  Is it not
possible people are yammering so much about it on the mailing lists
about problems because the people who wrote this don't even check if
the man page is CORRECT?  But No!  Instead of fixing it, the they get
email replies on the damned mailing list, and 8 hours later, someone
ELSE pipes up with another problem!  Why don't you lame asses take
responsibility for the problem at hand, CHECK IF THE MAN PAGE IS
RIGHT, and instead of replying to the people who post, instead JUST
FIX THE DOCUMENTATION PROBLEMS?  Or should I remove authpf before you
get the idea?

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/usr.sbin/authpf/authpf.8 b/usr.sbin/authpf/authpf.8
index 6049d424885..aa0d6e2e33f 100644
--- a/usr.sbin/authpf/authpf.8
+++ b/usr.sbin/authpf/authpf.8
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-.\" $OpenBSD: authpf.8,v 1.14 2002/06/24 07:43:10 dhartmei Exp $
+.\" $OpenBSD: authpf.8,v 1.15 2002/06/24 07:59:48 deraadt Exp $
 .\"
 .\" Copyright (c) 2002 Bob Beck (beck@openbsd.org>.  All rights reserved.
 .\"
@@ -409,9 +409,9 @@ ipsec_gw="10.2.3.4"
 # allow out ftp, ssh, www and https only, and allow user to negotiate
 # ipsec with the ipsec server.
 pass in log quick on $internal_if proto tcp from $user_ip/32 to any \\
- { port 21, 22, 80, 443 } flags S/SA
+ port { 21, 22, 80, 443 } flags S/SA
 pass in quick on $internal_if proto tcp from $user_ip/32 to any \\
- { port 21, 22, 80, 443 }
+ port { 21, 22, 80, 443 }
 pass in quick proto udp from $user_ip/32 to $ipsec_gw/32 port = isakmp \\
  keep-state
 pass in quick proto esp from $user_ip/32 to $ipsec_gw/32