diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'usr.bin/learn/lib/morefiles/L1.1b')
-rw-r--r-- | usr.bin/learn/lib/morefiles/L1.1b | 242 |
1 files changed, 242 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/usr.bin/learn/lib/morefiles/L1.1b b/usr.bin/learn/lib/morefiles/L1.1b new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..19d8f1ccd67 --- /dev/null +++ b/usr.bin/learn/lib/morefiles/L1.1b @@ -0,0 +1,242 @@ +#print +Now that you know what word is wrong, you still have to find +it in one of the memo files so you can correct it. One way +is to use the text editor "ed", but that is rather slow. Better +is to use the pattern-finding program "grep", which looks through +a set of files to find a particular word. To find all occurrences +of "glop" in the files tom, dick and harry, you need only type + + grep 'glop' tom dick harry + +The first thing is the word that grep is to search for; +any remaining names are file names, which are searched in order. +The quotes around the word to be searched for aren't +always necessary, but it's a good habit to use them +anyway. Later on we'll see some examples where they are really +needed. + +Use grep to find the memo file that contains the spelling error, +and type "answer name", where "name" is the file you decide on. +#create memo1 +(This comes from a federalist paper by alexander hamilton.) + It has been mentioned as one of the advantages to be expected +from the cooperation of the Senate, in the business +of appointments, that it would contribute to the +stability of the administration. The consent of that body +would be necessary to displace as well as to appoint. A +change of the Chief Magistrate, therefore, would not occasion +so violent or so general a revolution in the officers +of the government as might be expected if he were the +sole disposer of offices. Where a man in any station had +given satisfactory evidence of his fitness for it, a new +President would be restrained from attempting a change +in favor of a person more agreeable to him by the apprehension +that a discountenance of the Senate might frustrate +the attempt, and bring some degree of discredit +upon himself. Those who can best estimate the value of +a steady administration will be most disposed to prize a +provision which connects the official existence of public +men with the approbation or disapprobation of that body +which, from the greater permanency of its own composition, +will in all probability be less subject to inconstancy +than any other member of the government. + To this union of the Senate with the President, in the +article of appointments, it has in some cases been suggested +that it would serve to give the President an undue +influence over the Senate, and in others that it would +have an opposite tendency - a strong proof that neither +suggestion is true. + To state the first in its proper form is to refute it. It +amounts to this: the President would have an improper +influence over the Senate, because the Senate would +have the power of restraining him. This is an absurdity in +terms. It cannot admit of a doubt that the entire power +of appointment would enable him much more effectually +to establish a dangerous empire over that body than a +mere power of nomination subject to their control. + Let us take a view of the converse of the proposition: +"the Senate would influence the executive." As I have +had occasion to remark in several other instances, the indistinctness +of the objection forbids a precise answer. In +what manner is this influence to be exerted? In relation +to what objects? The power of influencing a person, in +the sense in which it is here used, must imply a power of +conferring a benefit upon him. How could the Senate +confer a benefit upon the President by the manner of employing +their right of negative upon his nominations? If it +be said they might sometimes gratify him by an acquiescence +in a favorite choice, when public motives might dictate a +different conduct, I answer that the instances in which the +President could be personally interested in the result would +be too few to admit of his being materially affected by the +#create memo2 +compliances of the Senate. Besides this, it is evident that +the POWER which can originate the disposition of honors +and emoluments is more likely to attract than to be attracted +by the POWER which can merely obstruct their +course. If by influencing the President be want restraining +him, this is precisely what must have been intended. +And it has been shown that the restraint would be salutary, +at the same time that it would not be such as to +destroy a single advantage to be looked for from the uncontrolled +agency of that magistrate. The right of nomination +would produce all the good, without the ill. + Upon a comparison of the plan for the appointment of +the officers of the proposed government with that which +is established by the constitution of this State, a decided +preference must be given to the former. In that plan the +power of nomination is unequivocally vested in the executive. +And as there would be a necessity for submitting +each nomination to the judgment of an entire branch of +the legislature, the circumstances attending an appointment, +from the mode of conducting it, would naturally +become matters of notoriety, and the public would +be at no loss to determine what part had been performed +by the different actors. The blame of a bad nomination +would fall upon the President singly and absolutely. The +censure of rejecting a good one would lie entirely at the +door of the senate, aggravated by the consideration +of their having counteracted the good intentions of the +executive. If an ill appointment should be made, the executive, +for nominating, and the Senate, for approving, +would participate, though in different degrees, in the +opprobrium and disgrace. + The reverse of all this characterizes the manner of appointment +in this State. The council of appointment consists +of from three to five persons, of whom the governor +is always one. This small body, shut up in a private +apartment, impenetrable to the public eye, proceed to the +execution of the trust committed to them. It is known +that the governor claims the right of nomination upon +the strength of some ambiguous expressions in the Constitution; +but it is not known to what extent, or in what +manner he exercises it; nor upon what occasions he is +contradicted or opposed. The censure of a bad appointment, +on account of the uncertainty of its author and for +want of a determinate object, has neither poignancy nor +duration. And while an unbounded field for cabal and intrigue +lies open, all idea of responsibility is lost. The +most that the public can know is that the governor +claims the right of nomination; that two out of the inconsiderable +number of four men can too often be managed +without much difficulty; that if some of the members of a +#create memo3 +particular council should happen to be of an uncomplying +character, it is frequently not impossible to get rid of their +opposition by regulating the times of meeting in such a +manner as to render their attendance inconvenient; and +that from whatever cause it may proceed, a great +number of very improper appointments are from time to +time made. Whether a governor of this State avails himself +of the ascendant, he must necessarily have in this +delicate and important part of the administration to prefer +to offices men who are best qualified for them; or +whether he prostitutes that advantage to the advancement +of persons whose chief merit is their implicit devotion to +his will and to the support of a despicable and dangerous +system of personal influence are questions which, unfortunately +for the community, can only be the subjects +of speculation and conjecture. + Every mere council of appointment, however constituted, +will be a conclave in which cabal and intrigue will +have their full scope. Their number, without an unwarrantable +increase of expense, cannot be large enough to +preclude a facility of combination. And as each member +will have his friends and connections to provide for, +the desire of mutual gratification will beget a scandalous +bartering of votes and bargaining for places. The private +attachments of one man might easily be satisfied, but to +satisfy the private attachments of a dozen, or of twenty +men, would occasion a monopoly of all the principal employments +of the government in a few families and +would lead more directly to an aristocracy or an oligarchy +than any measure that could be contrived. If, to avoid an +accumulation of offices, there was to be a frequent change +in the persons who were to be a frequent change +in the persons who were to compose the council, this +would involve the mischiefs of a mutable administration +in their full extent. Such a council would also be more +liable to executive influence than the Senate, because +they would be fewer in number, and would act less immediately +under the public inspection. Such a council, in +fine, as a substitute for the plan of the convention, would +be productive of an increase of expense, a multiplication +of the evils which spring from favoritism and intrigue in +the distribution of public honors, a decrease of stability +in the administration of the government, and a diminution +of the security against an undue influence of the +executive. And yet such a council has been warmly contended +for as an essential amendment in the proposed +Constitution. + I could not with propriety conclude my observations +on the subject of appointments without taking notice of +a scheme for which there have appeared some, though +#create memo4 +but a few advocates; I mean that of uniting the House of +Representatives in the power of making them. I shall, +however, do little more than mention it, as I cannot +imagine that it is likely to gain the countenance of any +considerable part of the community. A body so fluctuating +and at the same time so numerous can never be +deemed proper for the exercise of that power. Its unfitness +will appear manifest to all when it is recollected that +in half a century it may consist of three or four hundred +persons. All the advantages of the stability, both of the +Executive and of the Senate, would be defeated by this +union, and infinite delays and embarrassments would be +occasioned. The exampled of most of the States in their +local constitutions encourages us to reprobate the idea. + The only remaining powers of the executive are comprehended +in giving information to Congress of the state +of the Union; in recommending to their consideration +such measures as he shall judge expedient; in convening +them, or either branch, upon extraordinary occasions; in +adjourning them when they cannot themselves agree upon +the time of adjournment; in receiving ambassadors and +other public ministers; in faithfully executing the laws; +and in commissioning all the officers of the United States. + Except some cavils about the power of convening either +house of the legislature, and that of receiving ambassadors, +no objection has been made to this class of +authorities; nor could they possibly admit of any. It required, +indeed, an insatiable avidity for censure to invent +exceptions to the parts which have been excepted to. In +regard to the power of convening either house of the legislature +I shall barely remark that in respect to the Senate, +at least, we can readily discover a good reason for it. As +this body has a concurrent power with the executive in +the article of treaties, it might often be necessary to call +it together with a view to this object, when it would be +unnecessary and improper to convene the House of Representatives. +As to the reception of ambassadors, what I +have said in a former paper will furnish a sufficient answer. + We have now completed a survy of the structure and +powers of the executive department which, I have endeavored +to show, combines, as far as republican principles +will admit, all the requisites to energy. The +remaining inquiry is: does it also combine the requisites +to safety, in the republican sense - due dependence on +the people, a due responsibility? The answer to this question +has been anticipated in the investigation of its other +characteristics, and is satisfactorily deducible from these +circumstances; the election of the President once in four +years by persons immediately chosen by the people for +that purpose, and his being at all times liable to impeachment, +trial, dismission from office, incapacity to serve +in any other, and to the forfeiture of life and estate by subsequent +prosecution in the common course of law. But +these precautions, great as they are, are not the only +ones which the plan of the convention has provided in +favor of the public security. In the only instances in which +the abuse of the executive authority was materially to be +feared, the chief Magistrate of the United States, would, +by that plan, be subjected to the control of a branch of +the legislative body. What more can an enlightened and +reasonable people desire? +#copyin +#user +#uncopyin +#match memo4 +#log +#next +1.1c 10 |