src - OpenBSD base system

Age	Commit message (Collapse)	Author
2001-05-11	use strlcpy instead of strncpy+a[len-1]='\0'	Michael Shalayeff

2001-01-28	$OpenBSD$	Niklas Hallqvist

2000-10-18	sort out printf formats according to types, 64bit arithmetics in ffs_df; ↵	Michael Shalayeff
	millert@ ok
1999-05-31	New struct statfs with mount options. NOTE: this replaces statfs(2),	Todd C. Miller
	fstatfs(2), and getfsstat(2) so you will need to build a new kernel before doing a "make build" or you will get "unimplemented syscall" errors. The new struct statfs has the following featuires: o Has a u_int32_t flags field--now softdep can have a real flag. o Uses u_int32_t instead of longs (nicer on the alpha). Note: the man page used to lie about setting invalid/unused fields to -1. SunOS does that but our code never has. o Gets rid of f_type completely. It hasn't been used since NetBSD 0.9 and having it there but always 0 is confusing. It is conceivable that this may cause some old code to not compile but that is better than silently breaking. o Adds a mount_info union that contains the FSTYPE_args struct. This means that "mount" can now tell you all the options a filesystem was mounted with. This is especially nice for NFS. Other changes: o The linux statfs emulation didn't convert between BSD fs names and linux f_type numbers. Now it does, since the BSD f_type number is useless to linux apps (and has been removed anyway) o FreeBSD's struct statfs is different from our (both old and new) and thus needs conversion. Previously, the OpenBSD syscalls were used without any real translation. o mount(8) will now show extra info when invoked with no arguments. However, to see everything you need to use the -v (verbose) flag.
1997-06-30	Wall	Theo de Raadt

1997-06-16	Better support for unmounted filesystems (i.e. df /dev/rsd0a):	denny
	- interpret the superblock of lfs, ext2fs, and ffs filesystems. - never mount() an offline filesystem, always read its superblock. - use the same algorithm as statfs() for ffs, get the same answers. Even so, now I'm really unsure this code should remain in df. Similar functionality should be added to dumpfs or fsck instead.