| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
If list expansion produces peer pairings between different address
families, this should be an error.
Suggested by and ok hshoexer@
|
|
ok niallo@ deraadt@
|
|
ok hshoexer@
|
|
|
|
ok xsa@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ok ray@
|
|
OK xsa@
|
|
keyword we don't do yet. Now we can enable the test.
OK niallo@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(the argument number is included in -Wbounded error messages)
|
|
thus, we need the SUDO variable to be set. if not set, the test would
also pass ok, but only because exit status 2 and 127 looked the same to the
test.
ok markus@
|
|
Contents of comments are obviously part of the diff tests.
|
|
rescinded 22 July 1999.
|
|
for stuff that will soon be commited. In the meanwhile disable
them. Noticed by david@, thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
any" rules without a peer specified. These tests resulted in the
recent fix in ipsecctl/ike.c.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
due to recently fixed code
move some ike?? to ikefail?
|
|
"looks right" hshoexer@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ok hshoexer@
|
|
ok hshoexer@
|
