Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
|
|
skip the most common value read (which is often 0xff anyways)
|
|
of the registers.... tested by dhartmei and others
|
|
ok deraadt@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ok deraadt@
|
|
tested by niklas@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ok deraadt@
|
|
ok deraadt@
|
|
ok drahn@
|
|
|
|
become quite complicated. work done by matt@bodgit-n-scarper.com after
i explained how daft these devices are
|
|
|
|
tested by fgs@ and Stuart Henderson.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fan so it is running. The nice auto fan speed isn't working currently.
Also gives temperature sensors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
the datasheets. Fix a few bugs in the handling of voltage sensors.
From Constantine Murenin <mureninc@gmail.com>.
|
|
make sc_temp_invalid an array and set 0x7f as an invalid reading for the
Maxim 6690 too
|
|
identical to the Maxim 6690. Also fixes a bug which caused Maxim 6642
parts to be mishandled; ok deraadt@
|
|
|
|
checks on existing devices.
"slap it in" deraadt@
|
|
|
|
|
|
with wilfried. unfortunately days have gone by without him (or
others) saying that it works fine. in it goes. maybe it will crash
for someone?
|
|
ways to determine the actual voltage multipliers, so move to a table
driven model, which we can tweak as we see more varients. checked
by kettenis jolan and roman
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|