| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
ok otto@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a few more sub-types as comments; ok kettenis
|
|
|
|
|
|
bmc's watching on the shared bus. if you disable ipmi, you might see it
pop up (reminder why ipmi / i2c mixes are disabled: some ipmi's seem to
violate the i2c bus locking protocol). tested by Alexander Lobodzinski
|
|
|
|
ok deraadt@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kernel thread of its own. the api has changed (which will be fixed in the
manpage shortly) so all the users of sensor tasks that i can find have
been fixed too.
noone tested, so its going in to force people to run with it.
"put it in" deraadt@
|
|
|
|
|
|
of new fields in the future is less disruptive. This is done similar
to how struct proc is handled for ps(1). ok jmc (man page changes)
tested fkr simon, and more suggestions from millert
|
|
|
|
skip the most common value read (which is often 0xff anyways)
|
|
of the registers.... tested by dhartmei and others
|
|
ok deraadt@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ok deraadt@
|
|
tested by niklas@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ok deraadt@
|
|
ok deraadt@
|
|
ok drahn@
|
|
|
|
become quite complicated. work done by matt@bodgit-n-scarper.com after
i explained how daft these devices are
|
|
|
|
tested by fgs@ and Stuart Henderson.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
