From b27e467a0f3fbb2ba1e30b32a18174f170b76ef2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jonathan Gray Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2011 18:51:02 +0000 Subject: As pointed out by Richard Guenther our definition of NULL was incorrect for c++ compilers that aren't gcc (or pretend to be gcc like clang). ok miod@ --- include/string.h | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'include/string.h') diff --git a/include/string.h b/include/string.h index f3ae14e15c2..3e754a83bc2 100644 --- a/include/string.h +++ b/include/string.h @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -/* $OpenBSD: string.h,v 1.21 2011/04/06 11:39:42 miod Exp $ */ +/* $OpenBSD: string.h,v 1.22 2011/07/03 18:51:01 jsg Exp $ */ /* $NetBSD: string.h,v 1.6 1994/10/26 00:56:30 cgd Exp $ */ /*- @@ -46,6 +46,8 @@ typedef __size_t size_t; #ifndef NULL #ifdef __GNUG__ #define NULL __null +#elif defined(__cplusplus) +#define NULL 0L #else #define NULL ((void *)0) #endif -- cgit v1.2.3