From 2e3ca97f3da9272772d58aefcdab59326b3bacc9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Frederic Cambus Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 12:24:46 +0000 Subject: Update inaccurate comment: rasops_copycols() doesn't use bcopy() anymore, but either memmove() or slow_bcopy(). OK nayden@ --- sys/dev/rasops/rasops.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'sys/dev/rasops') diff --git a/sys/dev/rasops/rasops.c b/sys/dev/rasops/rasops.c index 2fdbfb1266a..778c355549b 100644 --- a/sys/dev/rasops/rasops.c +++ b/sys/dev/rasops/rasops.c @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -/* $OpenBSD: rasops.c,v 1.47 2017/08/17 20:21:53 kettenis Exp $ */ +/* $OpenBSD: rasops.c,v 1.48 2017/08/22 12:24:45 fcambus Exp $ */ /* $NetBSD: rasops.c,v 1.35 2001/02/02 06:01:01 marcus Exp $ */ /*- @@ -661,8 +661,8 @@ rasops_copyrows(void *cookie, int src, int dst, int num) /* * Copy columns. This is slow, and hard to optimize due to alignment, * and the fact that we have to copy both left->right and right->left. - * We simply cop-out here and use bcopy(), since it handles all of - * these cases anyway. + * We simply cop-out here and use either memmove() or slow_bcopy(), + * since they handle all of these cases anyway. */ int rasops_copycols(void *cookie, int row, int src, int dst, int num) -- cgit v1.2.3