From d8bab98ba1221235efaafe3eb07f8f4301e25582 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Anton Lindqvist Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2022 16:29:57 +0000 Subject: A com_acpi_softc pointer is used as the interrupt callback cookie which is later on interpreted as a com_softc pointer. This is not a problem in practice as a com_softc structure is the first member of the com_acpi_softc structure. Using the actual types consistently yields a better symmetry in my opinion between registering the interrupt and the corresponding interrupt handler. ok deraadt@ kettenis@ --- sys/dev/acpi/com_acpi.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'sys/dev') diff --git a/sys/dev/acpi/com_acpi.c b/sys/dev/acpi/com_acpi.c index 9c1e4af0426..0289ca2ea18 100644 --- a/sys/dev/acpi/com_acpi.c +++ b/sys/dev/acpi/com_acpi.c @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -/* $OpenBSD: com_acpi.c,v 1.8 2022/04/06 18:59:27 naddy Exp $ */ +/* $OpenBSD: com_acpi.c,v 1.9 2022/06/28 16:29:56 anton Exp $ */ /* * Copyright (c) 2018 Mark Kettenis * @@ -159,9 +159,9 @@ com_acpi_is_designware(const char *hid) int com_acpi_intr_designware(void *cookie) { - struct com_softc *sc = cookie; + struct com_acpi_softc *sc = cookie; - com_read_reg(sc, com_usr); + com_read_reg(&sc->sc, com_usr); - return comintr(sc); + return comintr(&sc->sc); } -- cgit v1.2.3