From c1809b833fd76a96ac3af269b7e0adffa3ec9ed1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Visa Hankala <visa@cvs.openbsd.org>
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2021 09:28:27 +0000
Subject: Clarify usage of __EV_POLL and __EV_SELECT

Make __EV_POLL specific to kqueue-based poll(2), to remove overlap
with __EV_SELECT that only select(2) uses.

OK millert@ mpi@
---
 sys/ufs/ufs/ufs_vnops.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

(limited to 'sys/ufs')

diff --git a/sys/ufs/ufs/ufs_vnops.c b/sys/ufs/ufs/ufs_vnops.c
index 0652945fee6..ea6e2649e1d 100644
--- a/sys/ufs/ufs/ufs_vnops.c
+++ b/sys/ufs/ufs/ufs_vnops.c
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/*	$OpenBSD: ufs_vnops.c,v 1.153 2020/12/25 12:59:53 visa Exp $	*/
+/*	$OpenBSD: ufs_vnops.c,v 1.154 2021/12/11 09:28:26 visa Exp $	*/
 /*	$NetBSD: ufs_vnops.c,v 1.18 1996/05/11 18:28:04 mycroft Exp $	*/
 
 /*
@@ -1973,7 +1973,7 @@ filt_ufsread(struct knote *kn, long hint)
 		return (1);
 	}
 
-	if (kn->kn_flags & __EV_POLL)
+	if (kn->kn_flags & (__EV_POLL | __EV_SELECT))
 		return (1);
 
 	return (kn->kn_data != 0);
-- 
cgit v1.2.3