/* $OpenBSD: rf_memchunk.c,v 1.2 1999/02/16 00:02:57 niklas Exp $ */ /* $NetBSD: rf_memchunk.c,v 1.3 1999/02/05 00:06:13 oster Exp $ */ /* * Copyright (c) 1995 Carnegie-Mellon University. * All rights reserved. * * Author: Mark Holland * * Permission to use, copy, modify and distribute this software and * its documentation is hereby granted, provided that both the copyright * notice and this permission notice appear in all copies of the * software, derivative works or modified versions, and any portions * thereof, and that both notices appear in supporting documentation. * * CARNEGIE MELLON ALLOWS FREE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE IN ITS "AS IS" * CONDITION. CARNEGIE MELLON DISCLAIMS ANY LIABILITY OF ANY KIND * FOR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER RESULTING FROM THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE. * * Carnegie Mellon requests users of this software to return to * * Software Distribution Coordinator or Software.Distribution@CS.CMU.EDU * School of Computer Science * Carnegie Mellon University * Pittsburgh PA 15213-3890 * * any improvements or extensions that they make and grant Carnegie the * rights to redistribute these changes. */ /********************************************************************************* * rf_memchunk.c * * experimental code. I've found that the malloc and free calls in the DAG * creation code are very expensive. Since for any given workload the DAGs * created for different accesses are likely to be similar to each other, the * amount of memory used for any given DAG data structure is likely to be one * of a small number of values. For example, in UNIX, all reads and writes will * be less than 8k and will not span stripe unit boundaries. Thus in the absence * of failure, the only DAGs that will ever get created are single-node reads * and single-stripe-unit atomic read-modify-writes. So, I'm very likely to * be continually asking for chunks of memory equal to the sizes of these two * DAGs. * * This leads to the idea of holding on to these chunks of memory when the DAG is * freed and then, when a new DAG is created, trying to find such a chunk before * calling malloc. * * the "chunk list" is a list of lists. Each header node contains a size value * and a pointer to a list of chunk descriptors, each of which holds a pointer * to a chunk of memory of the indicated size. * * There is currently no way to purge memory out of the chunk list. My * initial thought on this is to have a low-priority thread that wakes up every * 1 or 2 seconds, purges all the chunks with low reuse counts, and sets all * the reuse counts to zero. * * This whole idea may be bad, since malloc may be able to do this more efficiently. * It's worth a try, though, and it can be turned off by setting useMemChunks to 0. * ********************************************************************************/ #include "rf_types.h" #include "rf_threadstuff.h" #include "rf_debugMem.h" #include "rf_memchunk.h" #include "rf_general.h" #include "rf_options.h" #include "rf_shutdown.h" #include "rf_sys.h" typedef struct RF_ChunkHdr_s RF_ChunkHdr_t; struct RF_ChunkHdr_s { int size; RF_ChunkDesc_t *list; RF_ChunkHdr_t *next; }; static RF_ChunkHdr_t *chunklist, *chunk_hdr_free_list; static RF_ChunkDesc_t *chunk_desc_free_list; RF_DECLARE_STATIC_MUTEX(chunkmutex) static void rf_ShutdownMemChunk(void *); static RF_ChunkDesc_t *NewMemChunk(int, char *); static void rf_ShutdownMemChunk(ignored) void *ignored; { RF_ChunkDesc_t *pt, *p; RF_ChunkHdr_t *hdr, *ht; if (rf_memChunkDebug) printf("Chunklist:\n"); for (hdr = chunklist; hdr;) { for (p = hdr->list; p;) { if (rf_memChunkDebug) printf("Size %d reuse count %d\n", p->size, p->reuse_count); pt = p; p = p->next; RF_Free(pt->buf, pt->size); RF_Free(pt, sizeof(*pt)); } ht = hdr; hdr = hdr->next; RF_Free(ht, sizeof(*ht)); } rf_mutex_destroy(&chunkmutex); } int rf_ConfigureMemChunk(listp) RF_ShutdownList_t **listp; { int rc; chunklist = NULL; chunk_hdr_free_list = NULL; chunk_desc_free_list = NULL; rc = rf_mutex_init(&chunkmutex); if (rc) { RF_ERRORMSG3("Unable to init mutex file %s line %d rc=%d\n", __FILE__, __LINE__, rc); } rc = rf_ShutdownCreate(listp, rf_ShutdownMemChunk, NULL); if (rc) { RF_ERRORMSG3("Unable to add to shutdown list file %s line %d rc=%d\n", __FILE__, __LINE__, rc); rf_mutex_destroy(&chunkmutex); } return (rc); } /* called to get a chunk descriptor for a newly-allocated chunk of memory * MUTEX MUST BE LOCKED * * free list is not currently used */ static RF_ChunkDesc_t * NewMemChunk(size, buf) int size; char *buf; { RF_ChunkDesc_t *p; if (chunk_desc_free_list) { p = chunk_desc_free_list; chunk_desc_free_list = p->next; } else RF_Malloc(p, sizeof(RF_ChunkDesc_t), (RF_ChunkDesc_t *)); p->size = size; p->buf = buf; p->next = NULL; p->reuse_count = 0; return (p); } /* looks for a chunk of memory of acceptable size. If none, allocates one and returns * a chunk descriptor for it, but does not install anything in the list. This is done * when the chunk is released. */ RF_ChunkDesc_t * rf_GetMemChunk(size) int size; { RF_ChunkHdr_t *hdr = chunklist; RF_ChunkDesc_t *p = NULL; char *buf; RF_LOCK_MUTEX(chunkmutex); for (hdr = chunklist; hdr; hdr = hdr->next) if (hdr->size >= size) { p = hdr->list; if (p) { hdr->list = p->next; p->next = NULL; p->reuse_count++; } break; } if (!p) { RF_Malloc(buf, size, (char *)); p = NewMemChunk(size, buf); } RF_UNLOCK_MUTEX(chunkmutex); (void) bzero(p->buf, size); return (p); } void rf_ReleaseMemChunk(chunk) RF_ChunkDesc_t *chunk; { RF_ChunkHdr_t *hdr, *ht = NULL, *new; RF_LOCK_MUTEX(chunkmutex); for (hdr = chunklist; hdr && hdr->size < chunk->size; ht = hdr, hdr = hdr->next); if (hdr && hdr->size == chunk->size) { chunk->next = hdr->list; hdr->list = chunk; } else { RF_Malloc(new, sizeof(RF_ChunkHdr_t), (RF_ChunkHdr_t *)); new->size = chunk->size; new->list = chunk; chunk->next = NULL; if (ht) { new->next = ht->next; ht->next = new; } else { new->next = hdr; chunklist = new; } } RF_UNLOCK_MUTEX(chunkmutex); }