sync to 1.7.24: In the .Nd line, \(em is typographically more sound than \- ,

so that's what e.g. NetBSD and FreeBSD do.  However, for *now*, we want to
stick with the exact behaviour of the in-tree groff in OpenBSD.
ok jmc@

1 files changed, 10 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/usr.bin/mandoc/mdoc_term.c b/usr.bin/mandoc/mdoc_term.c
index bf848c937f2..45b583f0a81 100644
--- a/usr.bin/mandoc/mdoc_term.c
+++ b/usr.bin/mandoc/mdoc_term.c
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/*	$Id: mdoc_term.c,v 1.23 2009/07/12 23:19:48 schwarze Exp $ */
+/*	$Id: mdoc_term.c,v 1.24 2009/07/13 00:26:24 schwarze Exp $ */
 /*
  * Copyright (c) 2008, 2009 Kristaps Dzonsons <kristaps@kth.se>
  *
@@ -1129,8 +1129,16 @@ termp_ex_pre(DECL_ARGS)
 static int
 termp_nd_pre(DECL_ARGS)
 {
-
+	/* 
+	 * XXX: signed off by jmc@openbsd.org.  This technically
+	 * produces a minus sign after the Nd, which is wrong, but is
+	 * consistent with the historic OpenBSD tmac file.
+	 */
+#ifdef __OpenBSD__
 	term_word(p, "\\-");
+#else
+	term_word(p, "\\(em");
+#endif
 	return(1);
 }