summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gnu/egcs
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMiod Vallat <miod@cvs.openbsd.org>2004-04-06 10:21:50 +0000
committerMiod Vallat <miod@cvs.openbsd.org>2004-04-06 10:21:50 +0000
commit099b7a05f2a3d685b23f53565c930a72ca60fffc (patch)
treedce32eef4e5d89a625ff9562210a31b8aa515ee3 /gnu/egcs
parent5bfb495f857af848988b9cbbb35a593fe4e5bdeb (diff)
When optimizing a logical arithmetic operation, which operands are both
comparisons using different operators, make sure to generate an insn with the correct mode. This means that constructs like if (c != -1 & i < 9999) and if ((i<=7) | (value != 0)) as found in transfig and teTeX, respectively, will now compile with optimization. Note the single & or | in these constructs - this kind is rare enough for this bug to have remained unnoticed until now...
Diffstat (limited to 'gnu/egcs')
-rw-r--r--gnu/egcs/gcc/config/m88k/m88k.md12
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/gnu/egcs/gcc/config/m88k/m88k.md b/gnu/egcs/gcc/config/m88k/m88k.md
index 3549dd22b07..11a782dc8e1 100644
--- a/gnu/egcs/gcc/config/m88k/m88k.md
+++ b/gnu/egcs/gcc/config/m88k/m88k.md
@@ -445,7 +445,7 @@
int cv1 = condition_value (operands[1]);
int cv2 = condition_value (operands[3]);
- operands[4] = gen_rtx (ROTATE, CCmode, operands[4],
+ operands[4] = gen_rtx (ROTATE, CCEVENmode, operands[4],
GEN_INT (((cv2 & ~1) - (cv1 & ~1)) & 0x1f));
/* Reverse the condition if needed. */
if ((cv1 & 1) != (cv2 & 1))
@@ -478,7 +478,7 @@
int cv1 = condition_value (operands[1]);
int cv2 = condition_value (operands[3]);
- operands[4] = gen_rtx (ROTATE, CCmode, operands[4],
+ operands[4] = gen_rtx (ROTATE, CCEVENmode, operands[4],
GEN_INT ((cv2 - cv1) & 0x1f));
}")
@@ -509,7 +509,7 @@
int cv1 = condition_value (operands[1]);
int cv2 = condition_value (operands[3]);
- operands[2] = gen_rtx (ROTATE, CCmode, operands[2],
+ operands[2] = gen_rtx (ROTATE, CCEVENmode, operands[2],
GEN_INT (((cv1 & ~1) - (cv2 & ~1)) & 0x1f));
}")
@@ -597,7 +597,7 @@
/* Make the condition pairs line up by rotating the compare word. */
int cv1 = condition_value (operands[1]);
int cv2 = condition_value (operands[3]);
- operands[4] = gen_rtx (ROTATE, CCmode, operands[4],
+ operands[4] = gen_rtx (ROTATE, CCEVENmode, operands[4],
GEN_INT (((cv2 & ~1) - (cv1 & ~1)) & 0x1f));
/* Reverse the condition if needed. */
if ((cv1 & 1) != (cv2 & 1))
@@ -629,7 +629,7 @@
/* Make the condition pairs line up by rotating the compare word. */
int cv1 = condition_value (operands[1]);
int cv2 = condition_value (operands[3]);
- operands[4] = gen_rtx (ROTATE, CCmode, operands[4],
+ operands[4] = gen_rtx (ROTATE, CCEVENmode, operands[4],
GEN_INT ((cv2 - cv1) & 0x1f));
}")
@@ -659,7 +659,7 @@
/* Make the condition pairs line up by rotating the compare word. */
int cv1 = condition_value (operands[1]);
int cv2 = condition_value (operands[3]);
- operands[2] = gen_rtx (ROTATE, CCmode, operands[2],
+ operands[2] = gen_rtx (ROTATE, CCEVENmode, operands[2],
GEN_INT (((cv1 & ~1) - (cv2 & ~1)) & 0x1f));
}")