diff options
| author | Ingo Schwarze <schwarze@cvs.openbsd.org> | 2015-05-01 16:56:37 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Ingo Schwarze <schwarze@cvs.openbsd.org> | 2015-05-01 16:56:37 +0000 |
| commit | c1c9fa77ba5ea5ed8fcb67309aefb2d4036dd237 (patch) | |
| tree | d49b72718a11dd5cb639ae5026b8ce476f3762f8 /gnu | |
| parent | d19768e5ee198333e493ba8851703cc268f99c42 (diff) | |
mdoc_valid_post() may indirectly call roff_node_unlink() which may
set ROFF_NEXT_CHILD, which is desirable for the final call to
mdoc_valid_post() - in case the target itself gets deleted, the
parse point may need this adjustment - but not for the intermediate
calls - if intermediate nodes get deleted, that mustn't clobber the
parse point. So move setting ROFF_NEXT_SIBLING to the proper place
in rew_last().
This fixes the assertion failure in jsg@'s afl test case 108/Apr27.
Diffstat (limited to 'gnu')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions