drm/amdkfd: Accounting pdd vram_usage for svm

From Philip Yang
4c332037fcbb9bb53c46ba4f156951429acc4d97 in linux-6.6.y/6.6.62
68d26c10ef503175df3142db6fcd75dd94860592 in mainline linux

1 files changed, 26 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/sys/dev/pci/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_svm.c b/sys/dev/pci/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_svm.c
index ce76d455499..6b7c6f45a80 100644
--- a/sys/dev/pci/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_svm.c
+++ b/sys/dev/pci/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_svm.c
@@ -391,6 +391,27 @@ static void svm_range_bo_release(struct kref *kref)
 		spin_lock(&svm_bo->list_lock);
 	}
 	spin_unlock(&svm_bo->list_lock);
+
+	if (mmget_not_zero(svm_bo->eviction_fence->mm)) {
+		struct kfd_process_device *pdd;
+		struct kfd_process *p;
+		struct mm_struct *mm;
+
+		mm = svm_bo->eviction_fence->mm;
+		/*
+		 * The forked child process takes svm_bo device pages ref, svm_bo could be
+		 * released after parent process is gone.
+		 */
+		p = kfd_lookup_process_by_mm(mm);
+		if (p) {
+			pdd = kfd_get_process_device_data(svm_bo->node, p);
+			if (pdd)
+				atomic64_sub(amdgpu_bo_size(svm_bo->bo), &pdd->vram_usage);
+			kfd_unref_process(p);
+		}
+		mmput(mm);
+	}
+
 	if (!dma_fence_is_signaled(&svm_bo->eviction_fence->base))
 		/* We're not in the eviction worker. Signal the fence. */
 		dma_fence_signal(&svm_bo->eviction_fence->base);
@@ -518,6 +539,7 @@ int
 svm_range_vram_node_new(struct kfd_node *node, struct svm_range *prange,
 			bool clear)
 {
+	struct kfd_process_device *pdd;
 	struct amdgpu_bo_param bp;
 	struct svm_range_bo *svm_bo;
 	struct amdgpu_bo_user *ubo;
@@ -609,6 +631,10 @@ svm_range_vram_node_new(struct kfd_node *node, struct svm_range *prange,
 	list_add(&prange->svm_bo_list, &svm_bo->range_list);
 	spin_unlock(&svm_bo->list_lock);
 
+	pdd = svm_range_get_pdd_by_node(prange, node);
+	if (pdd)
+		atomic64_add(amdgpu_bo_size(bo), &pdd->vram_usage);
+
 	return 0;
 
 reserve_bo_failed: