Retire RTM_LOSING, it no longer makes sense and on busy servers the

route socket is flooded with those messages. Instead maek sure that the
removal of the dynamic route that can happen is actually also sent to
the routing socket.
OK mpi@ henning@

1 files changed, 6 insertions, 18 deletions

diff --git a/sys/netinet/in_pcb.c b/sys/netinet/in_pcb.c
index d2626718533..93a45ee4426 100644
--- a/sys/netinet/in_pcb.c
+++ b/sys/netinet/in_pcb.c
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/*	$OpenBSD: in_pcb.c,v 1.239 2018/06/14 17:16:03 bluhm Exp $	*/
+/*	$OpenBSD: in_pcb.c,v 1.240 2018/07/11 13:08:00 claudio Exp $	*/
 /*	$NetBSD: in_pcb.c,v 1.25 1996/02/13 23:41:53 christos Exp $	*/
 
 /*
@@ -709,21 +709,11 @@ in_pcbnotifyall(struct inpcbtable *table, struct sockaddr *dst, u_int rtable,
 void
 in_losing(struct inpcb *inp)
 {
-	struct rtentry *rt;
-	struct rt_addrinfo info;
-	struct sockaddr_in6 sa_mask;
+	struct rtentry *rt = inp->inp_route.ro_rt;
 
-	if ((rt = inp->inp_route.ro_rt)) {
-		inp->inp_route.ro_rt = 0;
-
-		memset(&info, 0, sizeof(info));
-		info.rti_flags = rt->rt_flags;
-		info.rti_info[RTAX_DST] = &inp->inp_route.ro_dst;
-		info.rti_info[RTAX_GATEWAY] = rt->rt_gateway;
-		info.rti_info[RTAX_NETMASK] = rt_plen2mask(rt, &sa_mask);
+	if (rt) {
+		inp->inp_route.ro_rt = NULL;
 
-		rtm_miss(RTM_LOSING, &info, rt->rt_flags, rt->rt_priority,
-		    rt->rt_ifidx, 0, inp->inp_rtableid);
 		if (rt->rt_flags & RTF_DYNAMIC) {
 			struct ifnet *ifp;
 
@@ -734,10 +724,8 @@ in_losing(struct inpcb *inp)
 			 * so we're dealing with a stale cache and have
 			 * nothing to do.
 			 */
-			if (ifp != NULL) {
-				rtrequest_delete(&info, rt->rt_priority, ifp,
-				    NULL, inp->inp_rtableid);
-			}
+			if (ifp != NULL)
+				rtdeletemsg(rt, ifp, inp->inp_rtableid);
 			if_put(ifp);
 		}
 		/*