comment out ifconfig undo code. they are necessary to avoid memory

leakage, however, was too strict that they disallow multiple address
from same prefix to be assigned (when rtinit returns EEXIST).
we'll need to improve it.

1 files changed, 13 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/sys/netinet6/in6.c b/sys/netinet6/in6.c
index 296eacb83b3..5e1930cb4e9 100644
--- a/sys/netinet6/in6.c
+++ b/sys/netinet6/in6.c
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
-/*	$OpenBSD: in6.c,v 1.16 2000/03/12 06:16:58 itojun Exp $	*/
-/*	$KAME: in6.c,v 1.55 2000/02/25 00:32:23 itojun Exp $	*/
+/*	$OpenBSD: in6.c,v 1.17 2000/03/22 03:48:30 itojun Exp $	*/
+/*	$KAME: in6.c,v 1.63 2000/03/21 05:18:38 itojun Exp $	*/
 
 /*
  * Copyright (C) 1995, 1996, 1997, and 1998 WIDE Project.
@@ -628,6 +628,14 @@ in6_control(so, cmd, data, ifp, p)
 
 	case SIOCSIFADDR_IN6:
 		error = in6_ifinit(ifp, ia, &ifr->ifr_addr, 1);
+#if 0
+		/*
+		 * the code chokes if we are to assign multiple addresses with
+		 * the same address prefix (rtinit() will return EEXIST, which
+		 * is not fatal actually).  we will get memory leak if we
+		 * don't do it.
+		 * -> we may want to hide EEXIST from rtinit().
+		 */
   undo:
 		if (error && newifaddr) {
 			TAILQ_REMOVE(&ifp->if_addrlist, &ia->ia_ifa, ifa_list);
@@ -648,6 +656,7 @@ in6_control(so, cmd, data, ifp, p)
 			}
 			IFAFREE(&ia->ia_ifa);
 		}
+#endif
 		return error;
 
 #ifdef COMPAT_IN6IFIOCTL		/* XXX should be unused */
@@ -730,8 +739,10 @@ in6_control(so, cmd, data, ifp, p)
 		}
 		if (hostIsNew || prefixIsNew) {
 			error = in6_ifinit(ifp, ia, &ifra->ifra_addr, 0);
+#if 0
 			if (error)
 				goto undo;
+#endif
 		}
 		if (hostIsNew && (ifp->if_flags & IFF_MULTICAST)) {
 			int error_local = 0;