flesh out some details in STANDARDS regarding timespec;

ok sobrado millert

1 files changed, 17 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/usr.bin/at/at.1 b/usr.bin/at/at.1
index c09a1f0f9f2..30147734d64 100644
--- a/usr.bin/at/at.1
+++ b/usr.bin/at/at.1
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-.\" $OpenBSD: at.1,v 1.46 2013/07/16 00:07:51 schwarze Exp $
+.\" $OpenBSD: at.1,v 1.47 2014/01/09 21:22:49 jmc Exp $
 .\"
 .\" Copyright (C) 1993, 1994  Thomas Koenig
 .\" Copyright (C) 1993  David Parsons
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
 .\" (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF
 .\" THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
 .\"
-.Dd $Mdocdate: July 16 2013 $
+.Dd $Mdocdate: January 9 2014 $
 .Dt AT 1
 .Os
 .Sh NAME
@@ -347,6 +347,21 @@ Behaviour for the
 .Fl l
 flag differs between this implementation and
 .St -p1003.1-2008 .
+.Pp
+.St -p1003.1-2008
+states that
+.Nm batch
+jobs are submitted to the queue
+.Qq with no time constraints ;
+this implementation permits a
+.Ar timespec
+argument.
+The
+.Sy teatime
+keyword is an extension to the specification,
+and this implementation does not support the
+.Sy next
+keyword.
 .Sh AUTHORS
 .An -nosplit
 .Nm at