Update to Mesa 7.0.3. tested my oga@ and johan@

1 files changed, 5 insertions, 5 deletions

diff --git a/dist/Mesa/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_urb.c b/dist/Mesa/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_urb.c
index 79ff2b2d4..4ca6e99db 100644
--- a/dist/Mesa/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_urb.c
+++ b/dist/Mesa/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_urb.c
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ static GLboolean check_urb_layout( struct brw_context *brw )
    brw->urb.sf_start = brw->urb.clip_start + brw->urb.nr_clip_entries * brw->urb.vsize;
    brw->urb.cs_start = brw->urb.sf_start + brw->urb.nr_sf_entries * brw->urb.sfsize;
 
-   return brw->urb.cs_start + brw->urb.nr_cs_entries * brw->urb.csize <= 256;
+   return brw->urb.cs_start + brw->urb.nr_cs_entries * brw->urb.csize <= URB_SIZES(brw);
 }
 
 /* Most minimal update, forces re-emit of URB fence packet after GS
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ static void recalculate_urb_fence( struct brw_context *brw )
 
 	 brw->urb.constrained = 1;
 	 
-	 if (check_urb_layout(brw)) {
+	 if (!check_urb_layout(brw)) {
 	    /* This is impossible, given the maximal sizes of urb
 	     * entries and the values for minimum nr of entries
 	     * provided above.
@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ static void recalculate_urb_fence( struct brw_context *brw )
 		      brw->urb.clip_start,
 		      brw->urb.sf_start,
 		      brw->urb.cs_start, 
-		      256);
+		      URB_SIZES(brw));
       
       brw->state.dirty.brw |= BRW_NEW_URB_FENCE;
    }
@@ -191,13 +191,13 @@ void brw_upload_urb_fence(struct brw_context *brw)
    /* The ordering below is correct, not the layout in the
     * instruction.
     *
-    * There are 256 urb reg pairs in total.
+    * There are 256/384 urb reg pairs in total.
     */
    uf.bits0.vs_fence  = brw->urb.gs_start;
    uf.bits0.gs_fence  = brw->urb.clip_start; 
    uf.bits0.clp_fence = brw->urb.sf_start; 
    uf.bits1.sf_fence  = brw->urb.cs_start; 
-   uf.bits1.cs_fence  = 256;
+   uf.bits1.cs_fence  = URB_SIZES(brw);
 
    BRW_BATCH_STRUCT(brw, &uf);
 }